I don't usually like posting about law-related things, but here I am doing it for the second day in a row. Sort of.
Sometimes the law is funny. I regularly peruse the local courthouse news report, which lists the latest cases filed. Today I saw the following:
McKinniss v. PepsiCo, Inc., Case No. BC374750
Summary: Class action alleging Cap'n Crunch's Crunch Berries is marketed as containing berries but does not contain berries.
Wait! Stop the presses! Cap'n Crunch's Crunch Berries doesn't contain berries?! Really?! You mean these bright rainbow crunchy things aren't berries?!
Say it ain't so!
My world is shattered!
Great job, Mark and Darleen McKinniss! You're ridiculous! It's people like you who put food on my table, including certain corn and oat flour puffs colored with red 40, yellow 5, yellow 6, and blue 1. Thus, I thank you from the bottom of my heart.
Say it ain't so!
My world is shattered!
OMG, my favorite X-Mas memories revolve around Christmas Crunch. And then getting lots of Barbies and Polly Pockets.
ReplyDeletelove. the. pics.
ReplyDeletei'm cracking up over here. :-)
Ugh, the scandal!
ReplyDeleteI...I...I'm speechless...NOT BERRIES?!?!?
ReplyDeleteThe only reason Captain Crunch should be sued is because IT TEARS UP YOUR MOUTH! That stuff is lethal!
ReplyDeleteoh mah gah. you mean i've been feeding the fetus NON-BERRY crunch berries?
ReplyDeletethe cap'n's gonna pay for this.
Yes! That's why I avoid those cereals! CUTE PHOTOS!
ReplyDelete